Subscribe in NewsGator Online   Subscribe in Bloglines

LETTERS

Jul 1, 2004 12:00 PM

To the Editor:

Congratulations on your fine coverage of the SADI awards in your May issue. However, your selection of judges' comments on the merits of each project was cause for concern. Having experience as a judge for other retail awards programs, I know that assessing how well an environment satisfies the needs of the customer is just as compulsory an element as creativity. The seemingly trivial attributes of the comments you chose to print can only support the claims of individuals with self-serving agendas, that designers create only for other designers, are only interested in winning awards and don't care about creating a better shopping environment.

For the future, I suggest that you encourage your judges to identify and better appreciate customer service innovations or amenities represented by a design solution. Please use your publication to give appropriate credit to designers who work hard to cater to the customer (the ultimate judge), not just win beauty contests.
Jerry Gelsomino, FISP
Prospect, a retail image consultancy
Santa Monica, Calif.



Most Recent Story

Traffic Court Blog


Resources

Blogs

Here's where we will have a new, frequent conversation with our readers–alerting you to the interesting (and sometimes oddball) things we see every day as we scan the horizon of the retail real estate business

Blog Home

Retail Architecture Review 2008

Architecture Review 2008

The Retail Architecture Review 2008 includes our 19th annual Superior Achievement in Design and Imaging awards, insight from the American Institute of Architects’ Retail and Entertainment Knowledge Community and our Leaders in Retail Architecture section.
View the full listing

TIC Directory 2008

TIC Directory 2008


TIC Directory 2008
Only the Strong Survive

Financing hurdles slow tenant-in-common deals, sidelining a growing number of sponsors..


Browse Back Issues